^{-32}eV which is really small. (See bold text at bottom.) However, for alternative gravity theories this upper bound no longer holds.

Image via Wikipedia

Lee et al. have recently developed a new way to place a bound on the graviton mass that is general enough that it constrains this mass even in alternative theories to gravity. This technique involves measuring correlations in the gravitational waves from the timing residuals of pulsars.**Just a reminder**: fluctuations in the curvature of spacetime propagate as waves which are called gravity waves. The top right picture shows the gravity waves given off by two neutron stars orbiting each other. Pulsars, are "highly magnetized, rotating neutron stars" that emit a beam of light that can appear to flash the earth in very regular intervals like a lighthouse. See the lower right animation to see the "cycle of pulsed gamma rays from the Vela pulsar".

Back to the article. Here is how the authors put it:

The pulsar timing array is a unique technique to detect nano-Hertz gravitational waves by timing millisecond pulsars, which are very stable celestial clocks. It turns out that a stochastic gravitational wave background leaves an angular dependent correlation in pulsar timing residuals for widely spaced pulsars (Hellings & Downs 1983; Lee et al. 2008). That is, the correlation C(θ) between timing residual of pulsar pairs is a function of angular separation θ between the pulsars. One can analyse the timing residual and test such a correlation between pulsar timing residuals to detect gravitational waves (Jenet et al. 2005). We find in this paper that if the graviton mass is not zero, the form of C(θ) is very different from that given by general relativity. Thus by measuring this graviton mass dependent correlation function, we can also detect the massive graviton.

**Another aside:**Thinking of the power spectrum of the CMB, and taking a minute to play this game may be helpful. The power spectrum of the CMB is a correlation function of temperature fluctuations of the CMB. As that game shows, this correlation function changes significantly for changes in the amount of dark matter, dark energy, regular matter, etc... Therefore, the shape of the power spectrum tells you a lot of physics.

Lee et al. are doing the same thing with correlation functions of gravity waves with pulsar timing residuals. The shape of this power spectrum, which they denote as C(θ), changes significantly with graviton mass. The plot above shows this change. The plot on the left shows how C(θ) would look after 5 years of a bi-weekly observation and the plot on the right shows what C(θ) would look for a 10 year bi-weekly observation.

Using this technique and future gravity wave interferometers the authors claim that with 5 years of data they can place an upper bound on the graviton mass of 1x10

^{-22}eV and after 10 years they can place an upper bound of 3x10

^{-23}eV.

**10**

*Now, even if the graviton does have mass, to put into preservative how light this particle must be if its mass is around these numbers, I will remind people that the mass of the electron is 510,998 eV! So a mass on the order of*^{-23}eV is mind-blowingly tiny!

Kejia Lee, Fredrick A. Jenet, Richard H. Price, Norbert Wex, & Michael Kramer (2010). Detecting massive gravitons using pulsar timing arrays Accepted by ApJ arXiv: 1008.2561v2

When are we going to detect gravity waves? Is that the only prediction of general relativity that remains unconfirmed?

ReplyDeleteStan,

ReplyDeleteExcellent question. We are trying to detect gravity waves right now on the ground with LIGO. However, everyone I talk to thinks we will not be able to detect them until LISA is launched around 2020. And even then we are pushing it. However, most people I talk to believe LISA really has a good shot.

As for GR, yes gravity waves would be a huge deal to boost confidence in GR's ability to explain yet another issue relating to gravity. I don't know if I would call it a last prediction however only because there are many many predictions of GR still to be tested. Like for example: does GR hold on cosmological scales larger than what it has been tested in so far in every way GR can be tested? So there are lots of potential tests for GR to pas in the future.

But I should say if GR "fails" one of these "does GR hold on super-large scale levels" tests then GR will be no more false than Newtonian physics. Technically it may not hold on all scales but does an incredible job predicting what happens on scales it is suited for.

ReplyDeleteInteresting but I am working for my german blog currently, so I do not have a lot of time for commenting this :).

ReplyDeleteCartesian,

ReplyDeleteGood luck with your German blog.

Thanks Joe, but I keep on reading your blog and will try to do some comments when it is possible.

ReplyDeletePhoton is a wave, but not a wave. It's a particle, but it's not a particle. It's both , but neither. Humm???

ReplyDeleteOh! lets just make up somthing and we'll call it "Wave–particle duality". Not unlike Einstines cosmic constant, after all the universe can't be expanding. He should have stuck with what was in front of him. No, everyone would really think he was crazy.

Quantum theory can explain away the paradox I guess. It still is a theory right? That is quantum mechanics.

Can't see the forest for the trees. I like that saying. How about you?

I'm rambling. I hope you don't think I'm crazy.

Oh well i'm just brainstorming, so it's okay.

So, the graviton. Humm? Same problem so let's compare is to a photon, sounds good right?

To much math. How about gravity and photons are a distortion in space/time. Created by mass/energy. We are only capible of sensing three dimentions. We are inside the distortion of those dimensions. Therefore we can't measure it directly only the result of the distortion.

Energy/matter in absorbed or released, as endothermic or exothermic in chemistry, by changing space/time.

It's simple enough and someone could do the math. Hope you enjoyed the ride.

What do you think?

By the way.

ReplyDeleteDo you think mankind will evolve to the point that we will be capable of comprehending the vastness and the beauty of the universe?

Kevin,

ReplyDeleteThank you for sharing your brain storming. :) I admit this can all sound crazy and is often hard to wrap our minds round. But we can take comfort in knowing that our theories are confirmed by experiment. It is a very satisfying thing to see kno matter how bizarre or mind bending a theory is, its confirmation be experiment is very satisfying and encouraging.

As for your second point, I have hope that one day the human species will be capable of comprehending all the depth, wonder and beauty of the universe. Maybe I should write a blog post on these ideas.