data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed55d/ed55d4454d70753afe4ffff4f909117e6cc1de40" alt=""
It turns out that so-called "math-based majors" are in short supply - they make up only about 4% of college graduates. So good old economics tells us that if supply is low, demand is high, which is good news if you can do math.
By comparison, if you take a two of the most common non-"math based" graduate degrees, they would wind up at #2 and #19 on the list. A law degree pays an average starting salary of $73,396 and a masters of business administration averages only $50,301 to start. That means that, roughly speaking, it pays as well to do 4 years of math-heavy schooling as it does to do 6 to 7 years of math-light schooling.
Of course the sad part for those of us working on our PhD's is that the average starting salary for 9+ years of post-secondary education is $70,370.
Yes, the market has chosen math ability as the most superior talent one can posses and who am I to argue?
ReplyDeleteWhat CNN doesn't tell you is if you were to plot "major vs. awesomeness" not only would the math-intensive majors be on top but would be out at 5-7 sigma, depending how much physics is involved. (Physics is at ~+12 sigma.)
Unfortunately CNNMoney.com has yet to release the top starting awesomeness by major, but I'm sure that Joe's numbers are qualitatively correct.
ReplyDelete