tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post8309824057687379237..comments2024-03-27T20:43:05.862-07:00Comments on The Eternal Universe: How Should We View The Universe's Expansion?Joseph Smidthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02583891162785742138noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post-35974421099678537522009-08-29T07:09:48.091-07:002009-08-29T07:09:48.091-07:00observer, I agree that there is nothing wrong with...observer, I agree that there is nothing wrong with it. I just hope it turns out to be true.Joseph Smidthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02583891162785742138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post-88072494782721780522009-08-29T04:45:49.988-07:002009-08-29T04:45:49.988-07:00what's wrong with the idea of eternal universe...what's wrong with the idea of eternal universe? it is the same as compacting billions of billions .....of billions of tonnes mass in a tiny dot to allow "big bang"observernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post-7962297452975236332009-08-25T13:00:01.990-07:002009-08-25T13:00:01.990-07:00Mephibosheth, it was a good question and very comm...Mephibosheth, it was a good question and very commonly asked. The more such questions I get the more I know to post about.Joseph Smidthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02583891162785742138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post-40159814022162567242009-08-25T12:57:55.763-07:002009-08-25T12:57:55.763-07:00Whoa.
/Keanu Reeves
I see why my previous questi...Whoa.<br /><br />/Keanu Reeves<br /><br />I see why my previous question about Hubble's law was nonsensical given this model. Thanks for the post!Mephiboshethnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post-28541412753388964742009-08-23T12:59:42.168-07:002009-08-23T12:59:42.168-07:00Oh man, that's where I've gone wrong, I co...Oh man, that's where I've gone wrong, I completely forgot to factor in the right kind of pan!<br /><br />Jared, I expect a post from you one day about life on a general p-brane. :)Joseph Smidthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02583891162785742138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post-35708778274976333752009-08-23T09:17:41.339-07:002009-08-23T09:17:41.339-07:00It's because you don't have the right kind...It's because you don't have the right kind of bread pan. Proper cooking tools will yield the correct metric everytime! ;)Jared Greenwaldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07409347148589869607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post-89641787506431095562009-08-23T08:03:41.984-07:002009-08-23T08:03:41.984-07:00Yes, I like this analogy better too. Furthermore,...Yes, I like this analogy better too. Furthermore, as I suggested, I am convinced that it is more physically accurate. You really can get the FRW metric starting with that of a sphere and generalizing. I know of no way to get the FRW metric from modeling rising bread.Joseph Smidthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02583891162785742138noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4212234230338648875.post-20531215409864736982009-08-23T02:33:21.332-07:002009-08-23T02:33:21.332-07:00I like this exampke better than the expanding rasi...I like this exampke better than the expanding rasin bread dough. First thing I thought of was the notion of a horizon past which we cannot see.Stannoreply@blogger.com